We could drop observations for whom we do not know whether or when they were arrested. This is a bad idea and will almost certainly lead to biased results (see lecture on missing data)
N = 114 (out of 432)
A better approach is to treat the arrest timing for those who were not arrested during the 52 week sample period as missing data for which we have a definite lower limit.
There are many robust ways to deal with this sort of censored data. In a Bayesian context the most common approach is treat the missing values as parameters with strong priors
Dropping censored observations (bad)
Modeling censoring process (better)